Home | Archive | Photos | Slideshows | Database |
by George Rossano
(6 October 2012) Espoo, Finland After two and one-half years away from competition, Finlandia Trophy is the first good opportunity to see how long and winding a road Johnny Weir will have to travel to regain his former skill level, and then to surpass that to be competitive for the gold medal in Sochi, just 16 months away. The results details and marks details for the Men's event do not paint a pretty picture, though not a hopeless one. Weir placed fourth here, nearly 47 points behind the winner, Yuzuru Hanyu, the reigning World bronze medallist. At the top-most level, the TES and PCS results for Weir compared to the winner in each event segment provides the big picture. Weir has retained (or recovered) most of his skill set in Program Components but has a long road ahead in element scores. Men's Short Program Results Detail
|
Pl. | Nation | Segment Score | TES | PCS (factored) | Ded. | |||||||
4 | Johnny WEIR | USA | 69.03 | 31.94 | 37.09 | 0.00 | ||||||
# | Executed Elements | Base Value | GOE | J1 | J2 | J3 | J4 | J5 | J6 | J7 | J8 | Scores of Panel |
1 | 4T<< | 4.1 | -1.98 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -2 | -2 | -3 | -3 | 2.12 |
2 | 3A | 8.50 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.50 |
3 | FCSp4 | 3.20 | 0.50 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3.70 |
4 | 3Lz+2T | 7.30 | -0.12 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | -2 | 7.18 |
5 | StSq3 | 3.30 | 0.67 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3.97 |
6 | CSSp3 | 2.60 | 0.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -2 | 2.80 |
7 | CCoSp3 | 3.00 | 0.67 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.67 |
32.00 | 31.94 | |||||||||||
Program Components | Factor | |||||||||||
Skating Skills | 1.00 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 8.25 | 7.25 | 7.75 | 7.25 | 6.00 | 7.46 | ||
Transitions | 1.00 | 6.75 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.75 | 5.25 | 7.00 | ||
Performance/Execution | 1.00 | 7.50 | 8.25 | 7.25 | 8.50 | 7.25 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 6.75 | 7.54 | ||
Choreography | 1.00 | 7.25 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.75 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 6.75 | 7.42 | ||
Interpretation | 1.00 | 7.50 | 8.25 | 7.75 | 7.50 | 7.75 | 7.50 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.67 | ||
Judges Total Program Component Score (factored) | 37.09 | |||||||||||
Deductions | 0.00 |
Weir trailed the leader in the Short Program by only 1.65 points in PCS, but 10.09 points in TES, with most of the latter in the solo quad toe loop which was severely under-rotated. Except for the Transitions score, the component marks are promising for this point in his comeback, though the fact that some judges went into the fives and sixes is a concern. The lack of a jump element in the second half is also an issue. Putting the triple Lutz combination into the second half will be important this season, where we expect most of the men will have one if not two jump elements in the second half of their short programs.
To challenge the best, the scores are sending the following messages for the Short Program:
The Free Skating marks show a similar picture, with one additional area significant issue -- jumps in general.
Pl. | Name | Nation | TSS | TES | PCS | SS | TR | PE | CH | IN | Ded |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yuzuru HANYU | JPN | 172.56 | 90.70 | 81.86 | 8.21 | 7.92 | 8.38 | 8.21 | 8.21 | 0.00 |
2 | Richard DORNBUSH | USA | 168.80 | 92.12 | 77.68 | 7.92 | 7.58 | 7.79 | 7.88 | 7.67 | 1.00 |
3 | Javier FERNANDEZ | ESP | 154.43 | 72.95 | 81.48 | 8.08 | 7.83 | 8.25 | 8.25 | 8.33 | 0.00 |
4 | Kento NAKAMURA | JPN | 133.28 | 66.94 | 68.34 | 7.04 | 6.67 | 6.71 | 6.92 | 6.83 | 2.00 |
5 | Johnny WEIR | USA | 132.39 | 56.65 | 75.74 | 7.50 | 7.25 | 7.50 | 7.83 | 7.79 | 0.00 |
6 | Misha GE | UZB | 126.60 | 61.76 | 65.84 | 6.25 | 6.13 | 6.83 | 6.75 | 6.96 | 1.00 |
7 | Zhan BUSH | RUS | 125.28 | 60.44 | 65.84 | 6.75 | 6.25 | 6.42 | 6.83 | 6.67 | 1.00 |
8 | Maciej CIEPLUCHA | POL | 124.23 | 61.31 | 62.92 | 6.00 | 5.96 | 6.29 | 6.50 | 6.71 | 0.00 |
9 | Adrian SCHULTHEISS | SWE | 120.54 | 60.28 | 60.26 | 6.17 | 5.71 | 6.08 | 6.13 | 6.04 | 0.00 |
10 | Mikael REDIN | SUI | 98.87 | 49.61 | 49.26 | 5.04 | 4.50 | 4.88 | 5.13 | 5.08 | 0.00 |
11 | Valtter VIRTANEN | FIN | 95.12 | 43.80 | 51.32 | 5.33 | 4.83 | 5.08 | 5.13 | 5.29 | 0.00 |
12 | Matthias VERSLUIS | FIN | 92.21 | 44.63 | 48.58 | 5.17 | 4.54 | 4.75 | 5.08 | 4.75 | 1.00 |
13 | Julian LAGUS | FIN | 90.67 | 40.89 | 49.78 | 4.96 | 4.67 | 4.88 | 5.17 | 5.21 | 0.00 |
14 | Viktor ZUBIK | FIN | 89.53 | 43.69 | 45.84 | 4.75 | 4.33 | 4.63 | 4.63 | 4.58 | 0.00 |
15 | Samuel KOPPEL | EST | 80.70 | 38.62 | 42.08 | 4.42 | 4.08 | 4.13 | 4.33 | 4.08 | 0.00 |
Pl. | Nation | Segment Score | TES | PCS (factored) | Ded. | |||||||
5 | Johnny WEIR | USA | 132.39 | 56.65 | 75.74 | 0.00 | ||||||
# | Executed Elements | Base Value | GOE | J1 | J2 | J3 | J4 | J5 | J6 | J7 | J8 | Scores of Panel |
1 | 4T< | 7.20 | -1.83 | -2 | -1 | -2 | -3 | -1 | -1 | -2 | -3 | 5.37 |
2 | 3A | 8.50 | -1.50 | -1 | -2 | -1 | -2 | -2 | -1 | -1 | -2 | 7.00 |
3 | 3F (e) | 5.30 | -0.82 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -2 | -1 | -1 | -2 | 4.48 |
4 | StSq1 | 1.80 | 0.83 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2.63 |
5 | FCSp4 | 3.20 | 0.25 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3.45 |
6 | 2Lo | 1.98 x | -0.75 | -3 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -2 | -3 | -2 | -2 | 1.23 |
7 | 3A+2T | 10.78 x | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10.78 |
8 | 2Lz | 2.31 x | 0.00 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.31 |
9 | 3Lz<+2T | 6.05 x | -0.70 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | -1 | -2 | 5.35 |
10 | 3S | 4.62 x | 0.23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.85 |
11 | CSSp1 | 1.90 | 0.08 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1.98 |
12 | ChSq1 | 2.00 | 1.05 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3.05 |
13 | CCoSp4 | 3.50 | 0.67 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4.17 |
59.14 | 56.65 | |||||||||||
Program Components | Factor | |||||||||||
Skating Skills | 2.00 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.25 | 7.25 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.50 | ||
Transitions | 2.00 | 7.25 | 7.25 | 7.25 | 7.00 | 7.25 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 6.25 | 7.25 | ||
Performance/Execution | 2.00 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.25 | 7.75 | 7.00 | 7.25 | 7.75 | 7.25 | 7.50 | ||
Choreography | 2.00 | 7.75 | 8.25 | 7.50 | 8.00 | 7.25 | 7.75 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.83 | ||
Interpretation | 2.00 | 7.75 | 8.25 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 8.25 | 7.75 | 8.00 | 7.79 | ||
Judges Total Program Component Score (factored) | 76.74 | |||||||||||
Deductions | 0.00 |
A deficit of nearly 34 points in TES and nearly 6 points in PCS is a heavy burden to overcome the next 16 months
On the plus side:
Needs work:
Average component score for both short and long is 7.55, which is about one point below recent medal winning performances at Worlds. Lower Transitions marks and higher Choreography and Interpretation marks follow past performance for Weir. These component marks are better than his worst and worse than his best from his former competitive experience. Component marks here put Weir essentially at the level he was when he retired in 2010. Now he needs to build on that to take his component scores to the next level.
Currently the skater is about 50 points behind the pace needed for gold medal performances at Worlds or U.S. Nationals.