2011 Skate CanadaPairs Event |
|
|
|
|
1. No one skated clean in the Free Skate, though a few came close. Tatiana Volosozhar & Maxim Trankov, were not one of them, but they still managed to again crush the competition despite two significant errors. They more than doubled their Short Program lead to win the event by 20.56 points. On side-by-side triple Salchows Trankov stepped out of the jump, resulting og GoEs of -1 and -2. Throw triple Salchow was two footed and received GoEs of -1 and -2, except for one judge who got fooled by the height and distance and went to +2. Their group 3 lift had a small shoulder assist on the set down, which caused one judge to go to -1, and their closing pair combination spin had a small loss of balance near the end of it that caused one judge to go to -1. On the plus side, the remaining elements were all strongly executed, including a dazzling throw triple loop. The lifts were all very well done, including a fully clean triple twist caught in the air with no assisting shortcuts in the takeoff or set down. Due to the errors their TES was 0.82 behind Sui & Han. But in the components they had no competition. Skating to music from the movie "Black Swan" the Russian team gave a very dramatic if somewhat sloppy performance. With further polish this routine will serve them well the rest of the season. Their component scores averaged near 8.4, with Transitions down near 1/2 point compared to the other components. Their PCS was 10.19 points ahead of the Chinese team. 2. Wenjing Sui & Cong Han moved up two places in the Free Skate to finish second overall. They had one of the cleanest programs of the group, with only a side-by-side three jump combination scored at -3, with all three jumps called either downgraded (3T) or under-rotated (two 2Ts). The tem opened with big level 1 quad twist. The element had a small shoulder assist on the catch and two judges went to -1, while the remainder scored it 0 through +2. They also had two strong triple throws, a Salchow and a Flip. The base value for the elements of the Chinese and Russian teams were nearly identical, with the Chinese team leading slightly in TES due to cleaner elements. On the presentation side, the team gave a fairly strong performance to "The soul of Flamenco," music a polar opposite from their country and western Short Program. The team did a fairly good job with their interpretation of the Latin theme, and received component scores that averaged just below 7, significantly below the leaders, but a good result for what is basically still a strong Junior Team that is competing at Senior only for some additional experience, their main goal being to qualify for the Junior Grand Prix Final. 3. Megan Duhamel & Eric Bradford dropped from second in the short to third in the long, for a third place final result by more than a three point margin. They attempted a program whose base value was only two points below the leaders, but errors in four elements pulled them down to having the fourth best TES. They opened with a good triple twist, that was called level 3 and completed several nice lifts and spins. A side-by-side three jump combination had an under-rotated triple Lutz, and the following triple Salchow attempt was doubled. Throw triple loop was cleanly landed, while throw triple flip had a poor landing with a step out, with seven -2s and two -3s. One group five lift was nicely executed, but the other had a broken set down with GoEs of -2 and -3. The teams' routine was nicely choreographed to "Viva la Vida" and "Yellow" by the contemporary group Coldplay, and was enjoyable despite the interruptions from the several element errors. Their Choreography mark was the highest of the five components, followed by Skating Skills. Overall their average component score was near 7.1, somewhat better than their marks in the Short Program. 4. Xiaoyu Yu & Yang Jin were a different team in the Free Skate, finishing fourth in the long after a eighth place result in the short, more than 20 points behind the leaders. Everything was better in the long compare to the short; elements, presentation, even components to some extent. They were so far back in the short, however, that this performance could not pull them up more than one place in the final results. The team's main strength was their elements, in one of the cleanest performance of the group. Only one element, side-by-side triple toe loops, was scored slightly negative, with only two -1s from the judges. They attempted the most difficult program in terms of base value, and ended up third best in TES. It was a season best performance for them. What held this team down, however, was their component scores. They did not really interpret their music ("Requiem for a Dream") and were painfully slow compared to the other teams. The average component score was just over 5.5, which was an improvement over the short where it was just under 5.3, but well below what is needed to be a competitive Senior team. 5. After a third place finish in the short, Narumi Takahashi & Mervin Tran dropped to fifth in the long for a fourth place finish. The team fell more or less in the middle of the pack for sloppiness, with three elements scored negative and one element receiving no value. An attempted triple toe loop - double toe loop degenerated into double toe loop - single toe loop, scored at -2 and -3. Throw triple Salchow had a hand down and a step out, while throw triple toe loop also had a poor landing. On choreographic spirals the team did not meat minimum requirements for holding the spiral position and the element received no value. This error alone was more than half the point difference that kept them out of third place, and pushed their TES value to seventh out of eight. On the plus side, the team had a strong opening triple twist, called level 3, and nice side-by-side triple Salchows. One of their group five lifts and their group three lift were also well executed. Their performance, in our view, was similar to the short, with minimal expression (interpretation), and a bit slow, with the performance getting increasingly sloppy towards the end. Their average component score was 7.1, 0.3 better than the short, so again the judges liked it a bit more than we did, with their highest component Choreography, and their lowest Interpretation. 6. Russia’s Lubov Iliushechkina & Nodari Maisuradze dropped to sixth in the Free Skate but held fifth place overall thanks to the cushion they accumulated in the Short Program. Four of their elements were scored negative, starting with the opening side-by-side triple Salchows where Iliushechkina under-rotated the jump, stepped out, and put a hand down -- all of which was missed by one judge who gave it a 0, while the remainder where at -2 and -3. They followed with a decent triple twist (level 3). A triple toe loop - double toe loop sequence was under-rotated on the triple, though opinion varied on that, with three judges at 0 and the remainder at -1. Throw triple Luts had a poor landing and was scored mostly with -1s, and two -2s. One judge missed the error again and was at 0. At this point the team mostly got there feet underneath them, with a nice group 5 lift with a one-arm air position and changes of position. Throw triple loop had a poor landing, with the judges mostly at -2 with two -1s and one judge again at 0. The remainder of the routine was two other nice lifts, a strong group 3 lift and a nice group 5. On the closing back inside death spiral Iliushechkina hip dragged the ice some and two judges went to -1, the remainder scoring it 0 or +1. Their routine was set to "A Chorus Line" and was adequately presented, but the choreography was basically the same old thing for this much used piece of music. To our mind, the team skated too far apart from each other too often and showed weaker than typical spatial awareness. Their program components averaged just under 6.7. Their individual marks ranged from 5.50 through 7.50, a rather large range that further reflects the inconsistent judging of this team. 7. Canadian Jessica Dubé & Sébastien Wolfe had a mediocre free skate which landed them in sixth place overall. Only two elements were scored negative, Dube falling on a triple flip, which also had an edge call, and on side-by-side flying change foot combination spins which had abysmal unison. Seven judges went to -1, we assume for that reason. Their strongest element was a nice group 5 Axel lasso lift. The remainder of the elements were clean but undistinguished. In components the team was likewise undistinguished, skating to "Heroes." Their components averaged 6.42 with Transitions at 5.86. Overall, the performance was slow and boring. 8. Bringing up the rear, Paige Lawrence & Rudi Swiegers were likewise technically mediocre and artistically uninteresting. Four elements were scored negative and four others received at least one negative GoE. Their only element of positive note was a well executed group 4 lift that was called level 4. Their performance to "Nouvell France" and "Man in the Iron Mask" was too sloppy to be enjoyable with same-old-same-old choreography. Their components averaged just shy of 6.2. |
2011 Skate
Canada Pairs
Medalists
|